Are visible marks a true indicator of the hurt inflicted/received in a catfight?

[linftr]

Forgive my ignorance, but in pictures of slaps and scratches being shown, it always appears that the lighter complexioned types, like me, are talking the worst of it.  Our flesh is visibly showing damage, discoloration, little scuffs, etc.  Are our darker complexioned opponents feeling the same hurts, and just not showing it so much, or is some skin simply more tender and susceptible.  Either way, it is a little demoralizing.

Hairpulling, on the other hand seems pretty equal, strands and bunches seem to littler the floor equally from everyone.  Just curious as to other's experiences.

(Please do not misinterpret this as 'are blacks, whites or browns, etc better than one another')

[shesfinished]

Lighter skin does show abrasions and redness more. Especially on the face, legs, backs and stomach. More visable damage, scratches and marks are more prevalent on the breasts. Hairpuling is equal IMO.

[Flamingo]

I do look at scrach marks as an indicator of who truly won the catfight.

Example Lovelace vs Jacky from suitefights.despite it been seen as a draw, Lovelace was cut to pieces

[LQQKING4CATFIGHTER]

  Would say it is not the only indicator as not all body punches or slaps will leave a visible mark but at the time of delivery are very hurtful.  In the cause of use of nails it is as can see bloody scratches on the victim.

[Horny-Jew]

Not a fan of permanent scars, however 

[JT Edson]

Forgive my ignorance, but in pictures of slaps and scratches being shown, it always appears that the lighter complexioned types, like me, are talking the worst of it.  Our flesh is visibly showing damage, discoloration, little scuffs, etc.  Are our darker complexioned opponents feeling the same hurts, and just not showing it so much, or is some skin simply more tender and susceptible.  Either way, it is a little demoralizing.

Hairpulling, on the other hand seems pretty equal, strands and bunches seem to littler the floor equally from everyone.  Just curious as to other's experiences.

(Please do not misinterpret this as 'are blacks, whites or browns, etc better than one another')

Interesting point you bring up oh sexy one.

[Flamingo]

The latest suitefights where one girl was left scratched up and bruised. If i was a judge, the other one would be the winner just by pure damage inflicted

[jessiefite]

Yes, to a certain extent.  Then you have to take into account injuries you can't immediately see.  Concussions, bruises to the liver, other deep bruises, broken bones, sprains, strains, etc.  These things can take hours or days to surface where there are visible consequences.  Sometimes, the adrenaline of fighting masks the pain and one doesn't realize the injury occurred until the adrenaline wears off.  Some of these non-visible injuries are more serious than the visible ones.

[Flamingo]

Not a fan of permanent scars, however 

The idea of one girl trying to cause that much damage so the other girl always remembers their catfight is arousing

[sender]

no one know what someone else feels. but i think the lighter the skin the more sensitive it is. and cuts and bruises more easily

[sender]

no one know what someone else feels. but i think the lighter the skin the more sensitive it is. and cuts and bruises more easily

[AnitaSpanking]

Are visible marks a true indicator of the hurt inflicted/received in a catfight?

nooooo...... i've been stretched and twisted and left face down in the mud without a mark.....