Isn't it something how one lowlife guy on a computer can cause a catfight company so much trouble. Just say something so strongly that some readers might think it's true. The truth is he's probably just one lowlife guy who gets his rocks off hurting others.
Um when you made this topic did you think of explaining what was going on?
Quote from: nova1274 on August 19, 2013, 01:28:53 AM
Um when you made this topic did you think of explaining what was going on?
The guy suggested a producer upgrade his camera equipment. The reaction was a little outlandish.
Quote from: braandpanties on August 20, 2013, 02:01:30 PM
Quote from: nova1274 on August 19, 2013, 01:28:53 AM
Um when you made this topic did you think of explaining what was going on?
The guy suggested a producer upgrade his camera equipment. The reaction was a little outlandish.
Lol, slick move Rin.
Quote from: walker on August 20, 2013, 02:24:22 PM
Quote from: braandpanties on August 20, 2013, 02:01:30 PM
Quote from: nova1274 on August 19, 2013, 01:28:53 AM
Um when you made this topic did you think of explaining what was going on?
The guy suggested a producer upgrade his camera equipment. The reaction was a little outlandish.
Lol, slick move Rin.
In not Rin idiot. Maybe I will start posting all of east coast cats or wrestling stuff from YouTube on here and people can see how crappy the video quality is. You are not doing this producer any favors acting this way.
I don't get the logic here. One individual calls another out, and that one then threatens to damage a producer? There's a tad too much anger around here. What's next, we slander all the producers, put them out of business and we go elsewhere on our computers?
Quote from: braandpanties on August 20, 2013, 07:50:00 PM
Quote from: walker on August 20, 2013, 02:24:22 PM
Quote from: braandpanties on August 20, 2013, 02:01:30 PM
Quote from: nova1274 on August 19, 2013, 01:28:53 AM
Um when you made this topic did you think of explaining what was going on?
The guy suggested a producer upgrade his camera equipment. The reaction was a little outlandish.
Lol, slick move Rin.
In not Rin idiot. Maybe I will start posting all of east coast cats or wrestling stuff from YouTube on here and people can see how crappy the video quality is. You are not doing this producer any favors acting this way.
I purchased several ECC videos, I don't think the video quality is crappy. Perhaps I'm wrong, can you name a few others that offer real fights that are better quality videos? I'm sure there are a few, but how many? I enjoy several companies products, I just don't know why you'd single out one with so much venom.
Quote from: shana on August 21, 2013, 12:23:21 AM
I don't get the logic here. One individual calls another out, and that one then threatens to damage a producer? There's a tad too much anger around here. What's next, we slander all the producers, put them out of business and we go elsewhere on our computers?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ba3v40knzmg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-8SqE-6-jk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WkIaNtvWvdI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkeQHW7B0d4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGdmKWQZz50
Quote from: shana on August 21, 2013, 12:40:04 AM
Quote from: braandpanties on August 20, 2013, 07:50:00 PM
Quote from: walker on August 20, 2013, 02:24:22 PM
Quote from: braandpanties on August 20, 2013, 02:01:30 PM
Quote from: nova1274 on August 19, 2013, 01:28:53 AM
Um when you made this topic did you think of explaining what was going on?
The guy suggested a producer upgrade his camera equipment. The reaction was a little outlandish.
Lol, slick move Rin.
In not Rin idiot. Maybe I will start posting all of east coast cats or wrestling stuff from YouTube on here and people can see how crappy the video quality is. You are not doing this producer any favors acting this way.
I purchased several ECC videos, I don't think the video quality is crappy. Perhaps I'm wrong, can you name a few others that offer real fights that are better quality videos? I'm sure there are a few, but how many? I enjoy several companies products, I just don't know why you'd single out one with so much venom.
Fighting Dolls
Foxy Combat
http://www.catfightingangel.com/video/video.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0S46mY4Z3PI
Some of the stuff from other companies you picked isn't even competitive fighting.
I recently watched two videos, and both were great fights. Hollie and Jemma at ECNWC, and Hollie and Maggie at ECC. I saw little or no difference in the clarity of the two, but each had their advantages. I like the multi angles of two cameras at ECNWC, but the video was far jumpier than the ECC video. There are better chances to get close ups with more than one camera, but often it was annoying how the camera guys at ECNWC got in the way of the action. Nevertheless, both videos are super because the women are really fighting unlike many other companies.
For fairness sake you could check as I just did how old the ECC video is that you selected. Released in Oct. 2010, and probably filmed many months previous to that date. ECC's producer hired a new videographer last year. Perhaps you could make a better argument if you compared ones filmed about the same time. Seriously, be fair in your arguments, and read Angrmgmt's facts.
Wow, Devious Stevious, you must be wearing those braandpanties over your head, mate!
Do you really think that anybody is going to take this hatchet job seriously?
You only created this latest account yesterday. Eleven posts already, and every one teeing off on the same producer.
Hollie vs Maggy has really got you rattled. It must be one hell of a fight. Maybe I'll buy it myself after all.
What the hell do you think this bullshit proves?
Any idiot knows that the way a video looks after being uploaded to youtube is no indication of the picture quality of the orignal. There are so many variables involved it's untrue.
Here are the facts, posted by another, more objective member, who doesn't have a grudge against ECC.
Quote from: angrmgmt on August 19, 2013, 05:50:55 AM
I own many ECC videos. Their first videos had a resolution of 320 x 240, which later improved to 480 x 360. Their most recent videos, including the Hollie vs Maggie match, have a 640 x 480 resolution. Before Catz Review began making their videos available in HD (1440 x 1080), many of their videos were released in 640 x 480.
So, the quality of ECC videos has actually improved over time. To quote the late Senator Moynihan, "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts."
I checked the picture resolution of some of the ECC videos in my collection, with the same result as angmngmt.
ECC do not sell HD downloads at the moment, though hopefully, they will be doing so soon. Meantime, the downloads they do sell are clear and watchable, with those filmed more recently having higher picture resolution than the older material.
If anybody is thinking of buying any of those older fights, I recommend getting them on DVD. The picture resolution of the DVDs I own is 720 x 480, which is pretty good, and they are all old fights, ECC#43 being the most recent.
Also, if you buy the DVDs three at a time, they are cheaper than the downloads, even allowing for shipping charges outside the USA - I live in the UK myself. And though it doesn't say so at the site, you can pay through Paypal. Email the distributor and he will tell you how.
Quote from: kafkod on August 21, 2013, 02:55:19 AM
Wow, Devious Stevious, you must be wearing those braandpanties over your head, mate!
Do you really think that anybody is going to take this hatchet job seriously?
You only created this latest account yesterday. Eleven posts already, and every one teeing off on the same producer.
Hollie vs Maggy has really got you rattled. It must be one hell of a fight. Maybe I'll buy it myself after all.
What the hell do you think this bullshit proves?
Any idiot knows that the way a video looks after being uploaded to youtube is no indication of the picture quality of the orignal. There are so many variables involved it's untrue.
Here are the facts, posted by another, more objective member, who doesn't have a grudge against ECC.
Quote from: angrmgmt on August 19, 2013, 05:50:55 AM
I own many ECC videos. Their first videos had a resolution of 320 x 240, which later improved to 480 x 360. Their most recent videos, including the Hollie vs Maggie match, have a 640 x 480 resolution. Before Catz Review began making their videos available in HD (1440 x 1080), many of their videos were released in 640 x 480.
So, the quality of ECC videos has actually improved over time. To quote the late Senator Moynihan, "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts."
(https://s4ck.com/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages2.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20111001202713%2Fprotagonist%2Fimages%2F8%2F88%2FDespicable-me-minions.jpg&hash=b3f697b365db18a6edef08a8907ee60e6c5e45bb)
I checked the picture resolution of some of the ECC videos in my collection, with the same result as angmngmt.
ECC do not sell HD downloads at the moment, though hopefully, they will be doing so soon. Meantime, the downloads they do sell are clear and watchable, with those filmed more recently having higher picture resolution than the older material.
If anybody is thinking of buying any of those older fights, I recommend getting them on DVD. The picture resolution of the DVDs I own is 720 x 480, which is pretty good, and they are all old fights, ECC#43 being the most recent.
Also, if you buy the DVDs three at a time, they are cheaper than the downloads, even allowing for shipping charges outside the USA - I live in the UK myself. And though it doesn't say so at the site, you can pay through Paypal. Email the distributor and he will tell you how.
Quote from: kafkod on August 21, 2013, 02:55:19 AM
Wow, Devious Stevious, you must be wearing those braandpanties over your head, mate!
Do you really think that anybody is going to take this hatchet job seriously?
You only created this latest account yesterday. Eleven posts already, and every one teeing off on the same producer.
Hollie vs Maggy has really got you rattled. It must be one hell of a fight. Maybe I'll buy it myself after all.
What the hell do you think this bullshit proves?
Any idiot knows that the way a video looks after being uploaded to youtube is no indication of the picture quality of the orignal. There are so many variables involved it's untrue.
Here are the facts, posted by another, more objective member, who doesn't have a grudge against ECC.
Quote from: angrmgmt on August 19, 2013, 05:50:55 AM
I own many ECC videos. Their first videos had a resolution of 320 x 240, which later improved to 480 x 360. Their most recent videos, including the Hollie vs Maggie match, have a 640 x 480 resolution. Before Catz Review began making their videos available in HD (1440 x 1080), many of their videos were released in 640 x 480.
So, the quality of ECC videos has actually improved over time. To quote the late Senator Moynihan, "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts."
I checked the picture resolution of some of the ECC videos in my collection, with the same result as angmngmt.
ECC do not sell HD downloads at the moment, though hopefully, they will be doing so soon. Meantime, the downloads they do sell are clear and watchable, with those filmed more recently having higher picture resolution than the older material.
If anybody is thinking of buying any of those older fights, I recommend getting them on DVD. The picture resolution of the DVDs I own is 720 x 480, which is pretty good, and they are all old fights, ECC#43 being the most recent.
Also, if you buy the DVDs three at a time, they are cheaper than the downloads, even allowing for shipping charges outside the USA - I live in the UK myself. And though it doesn't say so at the site, you can pay through Paypal. Email the distributor and he will tell you how.
I don't know who you think I am, but it seems like you are trying to reveal someone's real name on a message board. This producer and his minions have shared a personal email from a fan and now are trying semi-out another person who they think are posting about them. If the producer wants to advertise on this site, they should be prepared for the constructive comments on their material, even if they are not positive.
I am done posting about this company. This is honestly starting to scare me. It should scare other fans as well.
There is much better material out there.
I suppose you have classified me as a minion. Which personal email did the producer and his minions share? You go on to write that "they" meaning the producer and minions are trying to out you? Please don't lump the producer or this minion (me), that was another "minion".
I didn't say who I thought you were. I said you reminded me of Goebbels.
Quote from: braandpanties on August 21, 2013, 01:43:15 PM
I don't know who you think I am, but it seems like you are trying to reveal someone's real name on a message board. This producer and his minions have shared a personal email from a fan and now are trying semi-out another person who they think are posting about them. If the producer wants to advertise on this site, they should be prepared for the constructive comments on their material, even if they are not positive.
I am done posting about this company. This is honestly starting to scare me. It should scare other fans as well.
There is much better material out there.
What exactly are you pretending to be scared of? You have used your actual name here plenty of times in the past.
And I am nobody's minion. Just a fan who wants one of his favourite producers to carry on making enough money to film more of the fights I love.
They won't do that without sales, and you are trying to put people off buying from them. That is the only beef I have with you, and the only reason I started defending ECC when these attacks first began over a year ago now.
Hot damn, Kaf and I are certified "minions". He's scared? That's a good one. Do tell us "Panties" why you are so scared?
Could it be that you think your obsession led to your own exposure?
Power level 245!!!
Quote from: kafkod on August 21, 2013, 02:55:19 AM
if you buy the DVDs three at a time, they are cheaper than the downloads, even allowing for shipping charges outside the USA - I live in the uk myself.
What I meant to say is that the shipping charge is the same, wherever you live!
Quote from: braandpanties on August 21, 2013, 01:38:45 PM
(https://s4ck.com/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages2.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20111001202713%2Fprotagonist%2Fimages%2F8%2F88%2FDespicable-me-minions.jpg&hash=b3f697b365db18a6edef08a8907ee60e6c5e45bb)